Colin Farrell is too well hung
See more » Movies
But you'll be able to see it on the DVD release of A Home At The End Of The World.
I can reveal Colin’s considerable chopper caused such a stir among audiences at test screenings that scenes showing his privates ended up on the cutting-room floor.
A source says: “All you could hear were gasps when Colin appeared in his full-frontal pose.
Colin's BIG scene gets the chopper
Comments
Colin,
Whatever you have I can take. Bigger is better I always say. Big Mac, Big Colin - I’m open.
Bottom Boi
Posted by: Bottom Boi | June 30, 2004 10:18 PM
If it was Halle Berry or any other femal actress, full frontal nudity would be acceptable, BUT when it is the women’s turn to have some fun, it gets removed. This is sexist and totally unfair. Gasp or no gasp, I would like to have had the free choice to judge for myself whether the nudity was too much…or not enough. They kept talking about Will smith nude in I, robot, but the shot was taken only from behind him and the camera was positioned about ten miles away. I am not saying they had to be right up his backside, but if it was a woman, it would have had close ups.
Posted by: SweetSixteen | August 29, 2004 9:33 PM
Some account I read said that it was the male studio executives and fear of the reaction of male audience members that keeps male frontals out of movies.
Just wait for the DVDs.
Posted by: Richard | August 29, 2004 11:10 PM
i think they should have left the full frontal nude scene of colin farrell in the movie. i am not just saying this because i am gay and think colin is extremely attractive, but its so sexist and unfair to women, when they can show breasts and vaginas, but no penises.
Posted by: andy | November 24, 2004 8:46 PM
just how big is colin’s member anyway? he IS georgous, but just because he may be well hung doesnt necessariy make him more desirable. anyway - i wouldnt mind seeing his bulge - not nude - just his bulge!!
Posted by: david | November 24, 2004 9:53 PM
so -since my last posting, has anyone been really able to determnie just how big farrel is? I mean, we all know he’s georgous, but we’ve never even seen him in a speedo, yet alone showing us what he’s got in the nude. At least if we saw the front of a wet speedo, we’d have a better idea.
Posted by: david | January 19, 2005 8:34 PM
my other favorite is tom welling. we need to tind out if HE is hung too. He is never shown in shorts either, which leads me to believe there’s definately something sizable there to hide!!
Posted by: david | January 19, 2005 8:37 PM
i think they should show his penis! i just want to look at it and imagine sucking it…
Posted by: michael | March 25, 2005 12:15 PM
well - now it’s april - and no one has come up wiht just how big collins penis really is. and no one has been able to show any bulge wither - even in jeans - so how are we to believe it’s really sooo big that the test audience “gasped.?”
maybe it’s all just a little lie.
Posted by: david | April 6, 2005 7:10 PM